Freshwater Habitat and Fish Passage Team Overview Members participating with APNEP’s Freshwater Habitat and Fish Passage Action Team will pursue collaborative initiatives aligned with the following APNEP Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) actions: B2.1: Facilitate the development and implementation of an integrated freshwater habitat protection strategy. This protection strategy will complement the Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP), serving as a guide for inland waters. The plan will be a combined effort between North Carolina and Virginia, and it will include actions that address anadromous fish passage to and from spawning areas. Outputs: Integrated freshwater habitat protection strategy/ partnership Results: Improved management of water quality and ecosystem biodiversity to sustain ecosystem health B2.4: Facilitate the development of policies to minimize dredge and fill activities in naturalized areas and sensitive habitats. Policies will address direct as well as indirect dredge activities. Over time, the extensive drainage network in several coastal counties has become naturalized and provides important habitats for fish and wildlife. APNEP will work with its partners to ensure that these habitats are considered in maintenance of the network. Outputs: Coordinated policies and regulations regarding dredge and fill activities Results: Improved water quality and ecological integrity B2.5: Facilitate protection of designated anadromous fish spawning areas and inland primary nursery areas from marina impacts. Consistent with regulations and best practices, new projects should be directed away from or minimize impacts to specially designated areas vital to fishery resources. Marina development in inland waters, if not carefully considered and implemented, can damage valuable estuarine habitats. This action also supports retrofitting at existing facilities to improve aquatic habitat, as well as support for programs that safely dispose of onboard waste that might be discharged in open waters. Outputs: Policies and regulations to protect designated anadromous fish spawning areas and inland primary nursery areas from adverse impacts of new marinas Results: Increase in ecological integrity C4.1: Install fish ladders and eel-ways on existing dams and other permanent barriers. Fish ladders and eel-ways can preserve passage across dams that are otherwise providing societal benefits like drinking water supplies or electricity. APNEP will support the construction and maintenance of mechanisms for fish and eel passage around instream barriers. Outputs:New fish ladders and eel-ways Results: Improved fish populations and ecological integrity C4.2: Facilitate the removal of dams, culverts, and other in-stream barriers. Structures that have surpassed their designed lifespan or intended use will be targeted for removal. In-stream barriers scheduled for replacement also present opportunities to implement technologies that improve fish passage. Outputs: In-stream barrier removal projects Results: Improved fish populations and ecological integrity C4.3: Restore degraded anadromous fish spawning habitats. Anadromous fish spawning habitat is dependent on suitable current velocities, adequate dissolved oxygen levels, and low turbidity. APNEP will work to support suitable hydrologic flows and restore submerged aquatic vegetation in streams and rivers that contain anadromous species. Outputs: Habitat restoration projects Results: Improved fish populations and ecological integrity C4.4: Facilitate research to improve fish passage. APNEP will provide funding and support for research to improve fish passage. In-stream barriers will be studied to identify structures that may potentially be removed. Mechanisms for conveying anadromous species, such as fish ladders, will be considered and targeted for strategic locations. Outputs: Recommendations for improved fish and eel passage Results: Improved fish populations and ecological integrity For a more detailed explanation of these actions, APNEP’s CCMP can be found here. APNEP staff support: Tim Ellis (primary) Jimmy Johnson View all Freshwater Habitat and Fish Passage Team Meetings Materials Team Members Paul Angermeier (Virginia Tech) Brian Boutin (The Nature Conservancy) Eric Brittle (Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources) Mac Currin (NC State University, ret) Amin Davis (NC Division of Water Resources) Casey Knight (NC Division of Marine Fisheries) Wilson Laney (US Fish and Wildlife Service, ret.) Jeremy McCargo (NC Wildlife Resources Comission) Cam McNutt (NC Division of Water Resources) Peter Raabe (American Rivers) Fritz Rohde (NOAA) Roger Rulifson (East Carolina University) Shane Staples (NC Division of Marine Fisheries) Fred Tarver (NC Division of Water Resources) Bennett Wynne (NC Wildlife Resources Comission, ret) Frank Yelverton (Cape Fear River Watch)
Freshwater Habitat and Fish Passage Team Overview Members participating with APNEP’s Freshwater Habitat and Fish Passage Action Team will pursue collaborative initiatives aligned with the following APNEP Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) actions: B2.1: Facilitate the development and implementation of an integrated freshwater habitat protection strategy. This protection strategy will complement the Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP), serving as a guide for inland waters. The plan will be a combined effort between North Carolina and Virginia, and it will include actions that address anadromous fish passage to and from spawning areas. Outputs: Integrated freshwater habitat protection strategy/ partnership Results: Improved management of water quality and ecosystem biodiversity to sustain ecosystem health B2.4: Facilitate the development of policies to minimize dredge and fill activities in naturalized areas and sensitive habitats. Policies will address direct as well as indirect dredge activities. Over time, the extensive drainage network in several coastal counties has become naturalized and provides important habitats for fish and wildlife. APNEP will work with its partners to ensure that these habitats are considered in maintenance of the network. Outputs: Coordinated policies and regulations regarding dredge and fill activities Results: Improved water quality and ecological integrity B2.5: Facilitate protection of designated anadromous fish spawning areas and inland primary nursery areas from marina impacts. Consistent with regulations and best practices, new projects should be directed away from or minimize impacts to specially designated areas vital to fishery resources. Marina development in inland waters, if not carefully considered and implemented, can damage valuable estuarine habitats. This action also supports retrofitting at existing facilities to improve aquatic habitat, as well as support for programs that safely dispose of onboard waste that might be discharged in open waters. Outputs: Policies and regulations to protect designated anadromous fish spawning areas and inland primary nursery areas from adverse impacts of new marinas Results: Increase in ecological integrity C4.1: Install fish ladders and eel-ways on existing dams and other permanent barriers. Fish ladders and eel-ways can preserve passage across dams that are otherwise providing societal benefits like drinking water supplies or electricity. APNEP will support the construction and maintenance of mechanisms for fish and eel passage around instream barriers. Outputs:New fish ladders and eel-ways Results: Improved fish populations and ecological integrity C4.2: Facilitate the removal of dams, culverts, and other in-stream barriers. Structures that have surpassed their designed lifespan or intended use will be targeted for removal. In-stream barriers scheduled for replacement also present opportunities to implement technologies that improve fish passage. Outputs: In-stream barrier removal projects Results: Improved fish populations and ecological integrity C4.3: Restore degraded anadromous fish spawning habitats. Anadromous fish spawning habitat is dependent on suitable current velocities, adequate dissolved oxygen levels, and low turbidity. APNEP will work to support suitable hydrologic flows and restore submerged aquatic vegetation in streams and rivers that contain anadromous species. Outputs: Habitat restoration projects Results: Improved fish populations and ecological integrity C4.4: Facilitate research to improve fish passage. APNEP will provide funding and support for research to improve fish passage. In-stream barriers will be studied to identify structures that may potentially be removed. Mechanisms for conveying anadromous species, such as fish ladders, will be considered and targeted for strategic locations. Outputs: Recommendations for improved fish and eel passage Results: Improved fish populations and ecological integrity For a more detailed explanation of these actions, APNEP’s CCMP can be found here. APNEP staff support: Tim Ellis (primary) Jimmy Johnson View all Freshwater Habitat and Fish Passage Team Meetings Materials Team Members Paul Angermeier (Virginia Tech) Brian Boutin (The Nature Conservancy) Eric Brittle (Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources) Mac Currin (NC State University, ret) Amin Davis (NC Division of Water Resources) Casey Knight (NC Division of Marine Fisheries) Wilson Laney (US Fish and Wildlife Service, ret.) Jeremy McCargo (NC Wildlife Resources Comission) Cam McNutt (NC Division of Water Resources) Peter Raabe (American Rivers) Fritz Rohde (NOAA) Roger Rulifson (East Carolina University) Shane Staples (NC Division of Marine Fisheries) Fred Tarver (NC Division of Water Resources) Bennett Wynne (NC Wildlife Resources Comission, ret) Frank Yelverton (Cape Fear River Watch)
